20 years of Triboelectrostatic Beneficiation of Fly Ash – Vietbuild 2015 –

STET Triboelectrostatic separation has been used for the commercial beneficiation of coal combustion fly ash to produce a low carbon product for use as a cement replacement in concrete for nearly 20 years….

Download PDF

F. Hrach, S. Gasiorowski, H.Guicherd

ST Equipment & Technologies LLC (STET), 101 Hampton Avenue, Needham MA 02494 USA

CONFERENCE: Vietbuild Ho Chi Minh City – June 2015

KEYWORDS: Triboelectrostatic, Beneficiation, Dry Fly Ash, Carbon Separation ABSTRACT

STET Triboelectrostatic separation has been used for the commercial beneficiation of coal combustion fly ash to produce a low carbon product for use as a cement replacement in concrete for nearly twenty years. With 18 separators in 12 coal-fired power plants across the world, ST Equipment & Technology LLC’s (STET) patented electrostatic separator has been used to produce over 15 Million tonnes of low carbon product.

To date, commercial beneficiation of fly ash has been performed exclusively on dry “run of station” ash. STET’s electrostatic beneficiation technology reduces the carbon content of coal fly ash, producing consistent, low carbon ash for use as a substitute for cement. Fly ash with carbon levels up to 25% have been used to produce ash with a controlled carbon level of 2 ± 0.5%. A carbon-rich product is simultaneously produced to recover the fuel value of the carbon.

INTRODUCTION

The American Coal Ash Association (ACAA) annual survey of production and use of coal fly ash reports that between 1966 and 2011, over 2.3 billion short tons of fly ash have been produced by coal-fired utility boilers.1 Of this amount, approximately 625 million tons have been beneficially used, mostly for cement and concrete production. However, the remaining 1.7+ billion tons are primarily found in landfills or filled ponded impoundments. While utilization rates for freshly generated fly ash have increased considerably over recent years, with current rates near 45%, approximately 40 million tons of fly ash continues to be disposed of annually. While utilization rates in Europe have been much higher than in the US, considerable volumes of fly ash have also been stored in landfills and impoundments in some European countries. An excessive amount of unburned carbon in fly ash is the most common problem. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and European Standards (EN 450 Category A) require that the amount of unburned carbon in fly ash, measured by loss on ignition (LOI) not exceed 5% by weight. However, starting in the mid-1990s, installation of mandated NOx control equipment at coal-fired power plants increased the carbon (LOI) content of much of the previously marketable fly ash. Further requirements to reduce NOx and other power plant emissions have resulted in the contamination of fly ash with ammonia. As a consequence, while understanding the benefits of using fly ash in concrete continues to increase, the availability of suitable quality fly ash is decreasing. Processes to economically beneficiate off-quality fly ash are thus also of increasing interest to the power and concrete industries. STET has pioneered such processes for both carbon and ammonia removal from fly ash.

TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW – FLY ASH CARBON SEPARATION

In the STET carbon separator (Figure 1), the material is fed into the thin gap between two parallel planar electrodes. The particles are triboelectrically charged by interparticle
contact. The positively charged carbon and the negatively charged mineral (in freshly generated ash that has not been wetted and dried) are attracted to opposite electrodes. The particles are then swept up by a continuous moving belt and conveyed in opposite directions. The belt moves the particles adjacent to each electrode toward opposite ends of the separator. The high belt speed also enables very high throughputs, up to 36 tonnes per hour on a single separator. The small gap, high voltage field, countercurrent flow, vigorous particle-particle agitation and self-cleaning action of the belt on the electrodes are the critical features of the STET separator. By controlling various process parameters, such as belt speed, the feed point, and feed rate, the STET process produces low LOI fly ash at carbon contents of less than 1.5 to 4.5% from feed fly ashes ranging in LOI from 4% to over 25%.

Fig. 1 STET Separator
Fig. 1 STET Separator

The separator design is relatively simple and compact. A machine designed to process 36 tonnes per hour is approximately 9 m (30 ft.) long, 1.5 m (5 ft.) wide, and 2.75 m (9 ft.) high. The belt and associated rollers are the only moving parts. The electrodes are stationary and composed of an appropriately durable material. The belt is made of nonconductive plastic. The separator’s power consumption is about 1 kilowatt-hour per tonne of material processed with most of the power consumed by two motors driving the belt.

The process is entirely dry, requires no additional materials other than the fly ash and produces no wastewater or air emissions. The recovered materials consist of fly ash reduced in carbon content to levels suitable for use as a pozzolanic admixture in concrete, and a high carbon fraction useful as fuel. Utilization of both product streams provides a 100% solution to fly ash disposal problems.

RECOVERED FUEL VALUE OF HIGH-CARBON FLY ASH

In addition to the low carbon product for use in concrete, brand named ProAsh®, the STET separation process also recovers otherwise wasted unburned carbon in the form of carbon-rich fly ash, branded EcoTherm™. EcoTherm™ has significant fuel value and can easily be returned to the electric power plant using the STET EcoTherm™ Return system to reduce the coal use at the plant. When EcoTherm™ is burned in the utility boiler, the energy from combustion is converted to high pressure /high-temperature steam and then to electricity at the same efficiency as coal, typically 35%. The conversion of the recovered thermal energy to electricity in ST Equipment & Technology LLC EcoTherm™ Return system is two to three times higher than that of the competitive technology where the energy is recovered as low-grade heat in the form of hot water which is circulated to the boiler feed water system. EcoTherm™ is also used as a source of silica and alumina in cement kilns, displacing the more expensive raw materials, such as shale or bauxite, which are used in cement production. Utilizing the high carbon EcoTherm™ ash either at a power plant or a cement kiln, maximizes the energy recovery from the delivered coal, reducing the need to mine and transport additional fuel to the facilities.

STET’s Talen Energy Brandon Shores, SMEPA R.D. Morrow, NBP Belledune, RWEnpower Didcot, EDF Energy West Burton, and RWEnpower Aberthaw fly ash plants, all include EcoTherm™ Return systems. The essential components of the system are presented in Figure 2.

Fig. 2 EcoTherm™ Return system
Fig. 2 EcoTherm™ Return system

STET ASH PROCESSING FACILITIES

Controlled low LOI fly ash is produced with STET’s technology at twelve power stations throughout the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Poland, and the Republic of Korea. ProAsh® fly ash
has been approved for use by over twenty state highway authorities, as well as many other specification agencies. ProAsh® has also been certified under the Canadian Standards Association and EN 450:2005 quality standards in Europe. Ash processing facilities using STET technology are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. STET Commercial Operations

Utility / Power StationLocationStart of
Commercial
operations
Facility Details
Duke Energy – Roxboro
Station
North Carolina
USA
Sept. 19972 Separators
Talen Energy - Brandon
Shores Station
Maryland
USA
April 19992 Separators
35,000 ton storage dome.
Ecotherm™ Return 2008
ScotAsh (Lafarge / Scottish
Power Joint Venture) -
Longannet Station
Scotland
UK
Oct. 20021 Separator
Jacksonville Electric Authority -
St. John’s River Power Park,
FL
Florida
USA
May 20032 Separators
Coal/Petcoke blends
Ammonia Removal
South Mississippi Electric
Power Authority R.D. Morrow
Station
Mississippi
USA
Jan. 20051 Separator
Ecotherm™ Return
New Brunswick Power
Company
Belledune Station
New
Brunswick,
Canada
April 20051 Separator
Coal/Petcoke Blends
Ecotherm™ Return
RWE npower
Didcot Station
England
UK
August 20051 Separator
Ecotherm™ Return
Talen Energy Brunner Island
Station
Pennsylvania
USA
December 20062 Separators
40,000 Ton storage dome
Tampa Electric Co.
Big Bend Station
Florida
USA
April 20083 Separators, double pass
25,000 Ton storage dome
Ammonia Removal
RWE npower
Aberthaw Station (Lafarge
Cement UK)
Wales
UK
September 20081 Separator
Ammonia Removal
Ecotherm™ Return
EDF Energy West Burton
Station
(Lafarge Cement UK, Cemex)
England
UK
October 20081 Separator
Ecotherm™ Return
ZGP (Lafarge Cement Poland /
Ciech Janikosoda JV)
PolandMarch 20101 Separator
Korea South-East Power
Yeongheung Units 5&6
South KoreaSeptember 20141 Separator
Ecotherm™ Return
Lafarge Cement Poland
Warsaw
Poland20161 Separator

CONCLUSIONS

Maximizing the utilization of fly ash as a cement substitute in concrete production substantially reduces the carbon dioxide emissions associated with construction activity. However, pollution control systems implemented by the coal-fired power stations have resulted in a reduction of available fly ash meeting concrete-grade specifications. Further degradation of fly ash quality is expected due to further reductions in allowable gas emissions. In order to avoid loss of this valuable resource of material for concrete production as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions associated with concrete construction, processes for restoring the quality of the fly ash in an economic and environmentally viable way are needed.

The beneficiation of fly ash with STET processes further increases the supply of this important material. The STET beneficiation processes continue to be the most extensively applied methods to upgrade otherwise unusable fly ash to high-value materials for cement replacement in concrete. Eighteen SETT carbon separators are currently in place with over 100 machine-years of operation.

ProAsh® has found wide acceptance in the concrete industry as a premium fly ash requiring far less monitoring of air entrainment requirements due to less LOI variability than other ashes. Returning the high-carbon concentrate from the STET process to the boiler at a power plant allows recovery of the recovered carbon fuel value at an efficiency similar to coal. STET offers economical means to recover ash for high-value use that would otherwise be landfilled. Electrostatic carbon separation and Ecotherm™ return to the boiler provide a modular solution to a utility’s fly ash needs. These processes can be implemented in phases, or as a single project.

REFERENCES
[1] American Coal Ash Coal Combustion products and Use Statistics:
https://www.acaa-usa.org/Publications/Production-Use-Reports/